India: What can it teach us? A Course of Lectures Delivered before the University Of Cambridge — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   997
Müller, F. Max (Friedrich Max), 1823-1900, Wilder, Alexander, 1823-1908 [Commentator] Project Gutenberg 2007 Not confirmed
India; Sanskrit literature -- History and criticism; Vedas Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 91,792
Reading time 400 min
Text sections 12

The catalog record for India: What can it teach us? A Course of Lectures Delivered before the University Of Cambridge — Reading Notes provides practical reading context through 91,792 words, 6 hr 40 min estimated reading time, and 12 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “India,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Max Müller's Cambridge lectures argue for the independent development of Vedic literature, examining its language, religion, and ceremonial without foreign influence, while engaging with comparative mythology and the deluge narrative.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

while observing the myriads of races intervening between man and the monad, regard the world beyond as waste and void. Intelligences of every grade were believed to people the region between mortals and the Infinite. The angels and archangels, and the spirits of the just made perfect--_devas_ and _pitris_ they called them--ministered about the throne of the Supreme Being, and abode in the various spheres of universal space. Much of the difference between our thought and theirs consists in the names and not in the substance of our beliefs.

We may thus be prepared to receive what India can teach us. In her classic dialect, the Sanskrit, we may read with what success the children of the men who journeyed from the ancient Aryan Home into the Punjâb and Aryavartta have ventured "to look inward upon themselves, upward to something not themselves, and to see whether they could not understand a little of the true purport of that mystery which we call life upon earth." It was perfectly natural, as well as perfectly right, that as the beholder caught a glance of the Infinite Beyond, the image impressed itself upon his sensorium, as would be the case from looking at the sun, and he would as a result perceive that Infinite in all that he looked upon. Thus to the Sanskrit-speaking Aryan, as to the enlightened mind of to-day, not to see it was utter blindness. What we call science, law, morality, religion, was in his view pervaded alike throughout by this concept of Divine presence, or else it would have been less than a dream that had not come to the awaking. He was a follower of the light, not from the senses or the logical understanding, but from the eternal world. Let us not dwell on any darker shade of the picture. Clouds are dark to those who are beneath them; but on the upper side, where the sun shines, they glow with golden splendor. Let us be willing to contemplate India fraternally, and upon that side where the radiance of the Divine sheds a refulgent illumination.

NEWARK, N. J., May 14th, 1883.

WHAT CAN INDIA TEACH US?

When I received from the Board of Historical Studies at Cambridge the invitation to deliver a course of lectures, specially intended for the candidates for the Indian Civil Service, I hesitated for some time, feeling extremely doubtful whether in a few public discourses I could say anything that would be of real use to them in passing their examinations. To enable young men to pass their examinations seems now to have become the chief, if not the only object of the universities; and to no class of students is it of greater importance to pass their examinations, and to pass them well, than to the candidates for the Indian Civil Service.

But although I was afraid that attendance on a few public lectures, such as I could give, would hardly benefit a candidate who was not already fully prepared to pass through the fiery ordeal of the three London examinations, I could not on the other hand shut my eyes completely to the fact that, after all, universities were not meant entirely, or even chiefly, as stepping-stones to an examination, but that there is something else which universities can teach and ought to teach--nay, which I feel quite sure they were originally meant to teach--something that may not have a marketable value before a Board of Examiners, but which has a permanent value for the whole of our life, and that is a real interest in our work, and, more than that, a love of our work, and, more than that, a true joy and happiness in our work. If a university can teach that, if it can engraft that one small living germ in the minds of the young men who come here to study and to prepare themselves for the battle of life, and, for what is still more difficult to encounter, the daily dull drudgery of life, then, I feel convinced, a university has done more, and conferred a more lasting benefit on its pupils than by helping them to pass the most difficult examinations, and to take the highest place among Senior Wranglers or First-Class men.

Unfortunately, that kind of work which is now required for passing one examination after another, that process of cramming and crowding which has of late been brought to the highest pitch of perfection, has often the very opposite effect, and instead of exciting an appetite for work, it is apt to produce an indifference, if not a kind of intellectual nausea, that may last for life.

Max Müller opens his Cambridge lectures with a personal dedication to E. B. Cowell, acknowledging their long friendship and scholarly disagreements, particularly over the dating of classical Sanskrit literature. He insists that true scholarship values criticism over praise, and that the pursuit of facts should be impermeable to flattery or abuse. This sets the tone for a work that is both erudite and combative, grounded in philological evidence yet willing to challenge established views.

The Deluge as Recurring Natural Phenomenon

Müller examines the deluge stories found in various traditions, including the Vedic allusion where 'the waters cleaned this, Manu alone remained.' He argues that these accounts do not refer to a single historical event but to an annual natural phenomenon—the flood of the rainy season or winter. Drawing on Sir Henry Rawlinson's analysis of the Babylonian Izdubar epic, he links the flood narrative to the eleventh month, represented by the waterman in the Zodiac. Müller insists that the same natural origin should be claimed for the Indian deluge legend, even if later texts show foreign influences, the ancient hymns of the Rig-Veda remain untouched.

No Foreign Influence in the Vedas

After reviewing claims of Babylonian, Chinese, Persian, Parthian, and Bactrian influences on Vedic literature, Müller concludes that 'there really is no trace whatever of any foreign influence in the language, the religion, or the ceremonial of the ancient Vedic literature of India.' He describes the Vedic corpus as a 'home-grown poetry and a home-grown religion,' protected by natural barriers—the mountain ramparts, the Indus, the desert, and the Ganges. This isolation, he suggests, allows us to see what the human mind can achieve when left to itself, though he wryly notes that humans can turn even a paradise into misery.

The Scholar's Armor and the Love of Truth

Müller's preface reveals his scholarly ethos: 'sincere devotion to his studies and an unswerving love of truth ought to furnish the true scholar with an armor impermeable to flattery or abuse, and with a visor that shuts out no ray of light.' He values the production of a single new fact, even if it speaks against him, over empty praise. This stance is reflected in his willingness to stand 'almost alone' on the dating of classical Sanskrit literature. The lectures thus serve not only as an introduction to Indian thought but as a model of intellectual integrity, where friendship and criticism coexist in the pursuit of knowledge.

Readers should approach these lectures as a series of arguments rather than a comprehensive survey. Müller's evidence is drawn from comparative philology and mythology, and his conclusions are often provocative. The footnotes, including those by the American editor Alexander Wilder, add a layer of contemporary commentary. Pay attention to how Müller builds his case for Indian cultural autonomy, and note where he engages with—or dismisses—rival theories. The work rewards careful reading of its specific textual citations.

Some books sit side by side without ever speaking, and I find myself thinking of that when I return to Müller’s Cambridge lectures—his patient reverence for what grew unsupported. The same quiet wonder breathes inside Her Royal Highness Woman — Context and Discussion, where one looks at strength that never needed applause. Both remind me of old wells: deep, still, and full. That is all. Just a kinship I have noticed.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Take a moment to reflect on this book

Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Have you finished this book?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks