The Commercial Restraints of Ireland — Context and Discussion
Edition facts
The source record for The Commercial Restraints of Ireland — Context and Discussion measures this digital text at 74,806 words, 5 hr 26 min estimated reading time, and 12 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 24.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Great Britain -- Commercial policy,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Hutchinson had to face a very surly temper inside the walls. He faced it with a light heart, and triumphed over it; but it often turned on him, and stung him. He considered that it was well worth the cost; for in the first place it was an appointment for life; and then he had not to give up his lucrative practice in the law courts, which Froude says was worth nearly L5,000 a year; and in fact he never ceased to angle for the Mastership of the Rolls. In the next place, he got in addition a splendid town residence, on which eleven thousand pounds had just been expended; he got an income of two thousand one hundred a year; he got a very wide patronage, and he calculated on getting the control of the parliamentary representation of the University, which at that time was in the hands of the Fellows and Scholars. This last object would have been an immense acquisition for him; but he failed to win the game, the playing of which led him, according to Duigenan and others, into some of his most reprehensible courses.
As has been said above, in the rivalries of public life Hutchinson was pitted against a phalanx of as able men as ever appeared together in any country; and most of these men he supplanted and surpassed. They avenged themselves by lampooning him, and they were masters in the art. The Provost was assailed in prose and in verse, in couplet and in cartoon, in newspapers and pamphlets, in the "Lachrymae Academicae," "Baratariana," and "Pranceriana;" and these two last _pasquinades_ are unique in English literature. Their satire is as broad and as wounding as that of Junius, while it is often far more finished and playful; and there is no other instance of so many men of the same ability and station being combined in such a mosaic of detraction.[8]
"BARATARIANA," so called from Sancho Panza's island-kingdom, was written in verse and in prose, and it appeared originally as letters in the _Freeman's Journal_, which at that time, previous to its removal to "Macaenas' Head" in Bride-street, was published over St. Audeon's Arch.[9] The principal writers of these letters were Sir Hercules Langrishe,[10] Flood, Grattan, Yelverton, Gervase Bushe, and Philip Tisdall. The volume is "a collection of pieces published during the administration of Lord Townshend," and in it the Lord Lieutenant figures as "Sancho," Anthony Malone as "Don Antonio," Provost Andrews as "Don Francesco Andrea del Bumperoso," and Hely Hutchinson under the various titles of "Don John Alnagero, Autochthon, Terrae Filius, Monopolist, Single Session, and Serjeant Rufinus." It was in one of these papers that Grattan, with an audacious drollery, drew his celebrated character of Lord Chatham, as a privileged extract from a manuscript copy of Robertson's forthcoming "History of America." The description given by Langrishe of Hutchinson, who was not Provost at that time, is: "He talks plausibly and with full confidence, and whatever Pro-consul is deputed here Rufin immediately kidnaps him into a guardianship, and like another Trinculo erects himself into a viceroy over him. His whole elocution is alike futile and superficial. It has verdure without soil, like the fields imagined in a Calenture. He has great fluency, but little or no argument. He has some fancy, too, but it serves just to wrap him into the clouds and leave him there, while he holds himself suspended, planing and warbling like a lark, without one thought to interrupt the song. If he has any forte it is in vituperation or abuse. In 1766 he defeated the first Militia Bill.[11] His first stride in apostasy was supporting the Privy Council Money Bill in 1767 [for opposing which Anthony Malone[12] had previously lost the Prime Serjeancy in 1754, and the Chancellorship of the Exchequer[13] in 1761;] his next was in defending the motion for the additional regiments, whereby we were treated like a ravaged country, where contributions are levied to maintain the very force that oppresses it." For these ministerial services Hutchinson got the Prime Serjeancy, with an extra salary of L500 a year. In the next session he was useful to the Crown in regard of the Pensions Enquiry Bill and the Embargo Corn Bill, and was rewarded with the sinecure Alnager's place, worth L1,000 a year. He was made a Privy Councillor, got the reversionary grant of the Principal Secretaryship of State, and the commission of a half-pay majority, and was what Primate Stone termed "a ready-money voter." "He got more," says Flood, "for ruining one kingdom than Admiral Hawke got for saving three."[14] The "List of the Pack," one of the rhymes in the volume, has:
John Hely-Hutchinson's The Commercial Restraints of Ireland, first published in 1779, is a series of letters addressed to a noble lord, arguing against the trade restrictions imposed on Ireland by England. The work is grounded in economic analysis and historical precedent, drawing on examples from Egypt, China, and British America to illustrate how foreign capital and expertise often dominate a nation's trade. Hutchinson's prose is measured and forensic, building a case that the restraints harm both Ireland and the broader British Empire.
A Rhetoric of Reasoned Appeal
Hutchinson adopts the epistolary form, addressing a noble lord directly, which lends an air of reasoned debate rather than polemic. He frequently uses rhetorical questions—"Whether those apprehensions are now well-founded, should be carefully considered"—to guide the reader toward his conclusions. His tone is calm and analytical, even when discussing grievances, as when he notes that "the English, notwithstanding the supposed advantages of the Irish in this trade, undersell them at their own markets." This understatement contrasts with the epigraphs from Baratariana and Froude, which frame the work as a response to oppression. Hutchinson's own voice, however, avoids such emotional language, relying instead on logic and evidence.
Economic Arguments Grounded in Comparison
Hutchinson builds his case through comparative economic analysis. He argues that Irish labour is cheaper only because workers "live on food with which the English would not be content," implying that wages would rise if trade opened. He counters the fear that Ireland would undersell England by pointing to the Scotch example: despite full liberty to export woollen manufactures, Scotland produces only coarse cloths due to lack of capital. Hutchinson also notes that English merchants already control much of Ireland's trade, as "nearly one-half of the stock which carried on the foreign trade of Ireland in 1672 belonged to those who lived out of Ireland." These comparisons are not mere assertions but are supported by references to specific historical periods and regions.
The Role of Capital and Foreign Control
A recurring theme is the dominance of foreign capital in Irish commerce. Hutchinson observes that even in the victualling trade, "the Irish are but factors to the English," and that the export trade of British America was largely carried on by British-resident merchants. He extends this to ancient Egypt, China, and Indostan, where "the greater part of their exportation trade was carried on by foreigners." This pattern, he suggests, would continue if Irish trade were opened: English capital would flow in, and Irish merchants would remain subordinate. The argument is not simply about freedom but about the structural realities of capital and expertise.
Editorial Framing by W. G. Carroll
The 1882 edition includes a substantial apparatus: a life of Hutchinson, notes on figures like Dr. Duigenan and Grattan, and an index. Carroll's introduction and notes contextualize the work within Irish history, citing Froude's praise as "the best exposition which exists of the poisonous forces." The edition also reproduces a portrait by Sir Joshua Reynolds and a facsimile of Hutchinson's autograph. Carroll's editorial choices—including the inclusion of epigraphs from Baratariana and a ship metaphor—frame the work as both a historical document and a moral argument. Readers should note that the excerpts provided are incomplete; the full text may develop additional arguments or evidence not captured here.
Hutchinson's letters reward careful reading for their blend of economic reasoning and historical illustration. The 1882 edition's supplementary materials offer valuable context, but the core text stands as a detailed case against trade restrictions. Readers interested in eighteenth-century economic thought or Irish history will find this a substantive primary source.
I’ve often thought John Hely-Hutchinson, fretting over Ireland’s mercantile chains, would have found an odd comfort in Leaves of Life, for Daily Inspiration — Edition Insights. Where his letters weigh economic bonds, that small volume loosens the heart’s own fetters. Both speak to quiet endurance, each in its patient century, and I’ve shelved them near each other ever since.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.